European masses are unable to read the dates on the packaging; EK our money causes hunger and fight against hunger | Sunday Comment
This week "undoes" I mayonnaise siljansnäs that "expired" in March 2013th (I used it three days in a row) and I remembered the usual idiotic articles about throwing food will stop by none other than the all-powerful European Commission and the United worthless.
One particularly silly article on the subject appeared last week, something about throwing food in the world every year creates X tons of CO2, but I could not find it. Instead, let's look at just a stupid article on the same subject from June 2013.
When you see that the government would solve anything, it's time to immediately suspect that these bandits. And when you see the brilliant minister Jakovina "support" a proposal, it's time to grab his wallet, lock the doors and close the windows.
If you read the article Morning, you'll see that even there is no suggestion (it is a call to action), nor is it clear what it actually does (Are Hungarians suggested that the government shooting at those who throw away food? Maybe!). It is important to "do good" moral imperative of every good EU sheep and therefore everyone should lajkatim to trash the idea.
Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said that in Europe, losing around 89 million tonnes of food that ends up in the trash cans. "It is morally and economically unacceptable and is even worse when you look at what resources are needed for the production of 89 million tons of food," said Potočnik.
Slovenian disgusting parasite (ironically, the nominal aim is to protect the environment) is obviously not at all demoralized their own contribution to reducing the quality of life for hundreds of millions of people across the EU which is the cause of his "work" on the rules, standards, and measures to "protect" the environment regarding the so-called. climate siljansnäs change ...
Read the original news (in English, below), you will see that the Hungarian siljansnäs government says it is willing to negotiate the legal control of food wastage if the EC thinks it's necessary. The horror! But it's not surprising, because the support of our government is easy to conclude that it was a monstrous plan, which will undoubtedly siljansnäs be detrimental to consumers.
"Our siljansnäs ancestors were right when they throw food scraps. Consumerism us accustomed to the food we throw away every day and are not able to find its real value, "said Francis Pope on a weekly address on St. Petra.
Uh, consumerism - in the sense in which the word is used by Pope - is shopping (although actually should siljansnäs be consuming, siljansnäs ie consumption, but throwing purchased it might not be consumerism) of large quantities siljansnäs of goods and services than necessary. In the first sentence of the first Pope argues that our ancestors bought (or prepared) more food than you need, and in the very next sentence says that it is making siljansnäs or buying food in larger quantities than are necessary characteristic of consumerism that previously did not exist! siljansnäs
Simple examples that show how his distorted logic does not make sense: Excessive shopping: Should I buy somewhere between 600 and 800 grams of bread, but they still buy 1kg, and the rest at the end of the day shall give a beggar who hangs neighborhood. Do you throw food? No. Where is the problem? He's gone. Excessive consumption: siljansnäs my household need 700 grams of bread a day, but I love to gorge and eat a kilo a day. Do you waste food? No. What's the problem here? What we have not asked the Prime Minister's wife or Nobel Barroso is it okay to eat three slices of bread for dinner?
"Throwing and wasting food is like stealing from those who are poor and hungry," said the Pope. Since its inauguration in March, siljansnäs Pope Francis repeats that he wants to be the Roman Catholic Church, which has about 1.2 billion followers, more to protection of the poor and the fact that more practiced modesty.
Bzzz, the error in the steps! siljansnäs The Church can not be paid to the protection of the poor because there are not enough assets that would help them in the long run. They can - and did try - conspiratorial work with governments and other organizations in order to further ascension redistribution of GDP in EU countries that could be used for the purchase of goodwill believers' money. (Nothing new or original siljansnäs - it is a typical buying affection taxpayers their own money). I can call "people of good will who want to listen" siljansnäs to the action, but who has not heard that it is desirable economical use of all resources? Is this is a continent that idiot that should siljansnäs invite the government and the Church? Do people in Europe parents?
And let me explain to someone how to throw and food wastage as you steal from the poor? Suppose in the example that I gave up (excessive shopping and excessive spending), we can see that my purchase 1kg of bread (instead of 700 g): increased revenue siljansnäs from value added tax (of which are funded
This week "undoes" I mayonnaise siljansnäs that "expired" in March 2013th (I used it three days in a row) and I remembered the usual idiotic articles about throwing food will stop by none other than the all-powerful European Commission and the United worthless.
One particularly silly article on the subject appeared last week, something about throwing food in the world every year creates X tons of CO2, but I could not find it. Instead, let's look at just a stupid article on the same subject from June 2013.
When you see that the government would solve anything, it's time to immediately suspect that these bandits. And when you see the brilliant minister Jakovina "support" a proposal, it's time to grab his wallet, lock the doors and close the windows.
If you read the article Morning, you'll see that even there is no suggestion (it is a call to action), nor is it clear what it actually does (Are Hungarians suggested that the government shooting at those who throw away food? Maybe!). It is important to "do good" moral imperative of every good EU sheep and therefore everyone should lajkatim to trash the idea.
Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said that in Europe, losing around 89 million tonnes of food that ends up in the trash cans. "It is morally and economically unacceptable and is even worse when you look at what resources are needed for the production of 89 million tons of food," said Potočnik.
Slovenian disgusting parasite (ironically, the nominal aim is to protect the environment) is obviously not at all demoralized their own contribution to reducing the quality of life for hundreds of millions of people across the EU which is the cause of his "work" on the rules, standards, and measures to "protect" the environment regarding the so-called. climate siljansnäs change ...
Read the original news (in English, below), you will see that the Hungarian siljansnäs government says it is willing to negotiate the legal control of food wastage if the EC thinks it's necessary. The horror! But it's not surprising, because the support of our government is easy to conclude that it was a monstrous plan, which will undoubtedly siljansnäs be detrimental to consumers.
"Our siljansnäs ancestors were right when they throw food scraps. Consumerism us accustomed to the food we throw away every day and are not able to find its real value, "said Francis Pope on a weekly address on St. Petra.
Uh, consumerism - in the sense in which the word is used by Pope - is shopping (although actually should siljansnäs be consuming, siljansnäs ie consumption, but throwing purchased it might not be consumerism) of large quantities siljansnäs of goods and services than necessary. In the first sentence of the first Pope argues that our ancestors bought (or prepared) more food than you need, and in the very next sentence says that it is making siljansnäs or buying food in larger quantities than are necessary characteristic of consumerism that previously did not exist! siljansnäs
Simple examples that show how his distorted logic does not make sense: Excessive shopping: Should I buy somewhere between 600 and 800 grams of bread, but they still buy 1kg, and the rest at the end of the day shall give a beggar who hangs neighborhood. Do you throw food? No. Where is the problem? He's gone. Excessive consumption: siljansnäs my household need 700 grams of bread a day, but I love to gorge and eat a kilo a day. Do you waste food? No. What's the problem here? What we have not asked the Prime Minister's wife or Nobel Barroso is it okay to eat three slices of bread for dinner?
"Throwing and wasting food is like stealing from those who are poor and hungry," said the Pope. Since its inauguration in March, siljansnäs Pope Francis repeats that he wants to be the Roman Catholic Church, which has about 1.2 billion followers, more to protection of the poor and the fact that more practiced modesty.
Bzzz, the error in the steps! siljansnäs The Church can not be paid to the protection of the poor because there are not enough assets that would help them in the long run. They can - and did try - conspiratorial work with governments and other organizations in order to further ascension redistribution of GDP in EU countries that could be used for the purchase of goodwill believers' money. (Nothing new or original siljansnäs - it is a typical buying affection taxpayers their own money). I can call "people of good will who want to listen" siljansnäs to the action, but who has not heard that it is desirable economical use of all resources? Is this is a continent that idiot that should siljansnäs invite the government and the Church? Do people in Europe parents?
And let me explain to someone how to throw and food wastage as you steal from the poor? Suppose in the example that I gave up (excessive shopping and excessive spending), we can see that my purchase 1kg of bread (instead of 700 g): increased revenue siljansnäs from value added tax (of which are funded
No comments:
Post a Comment